- In conclusion
- Using LAML, the source of a WWW document is a program in Scheme
- A functional programming language is much better for our purposes than an imperative programming language
- Lisp can be used successfully as a markup language
- There is a tradeoff between 'pains' (using Lisp syntax and handling errors) and 'gains' (abstraction and automation)
- Homogeneous syntactic conventions for all future LAML document styles should be considered
- Modern functional programming languages would push on the type system in order to ensure grammatical correctness
- In the Lisp world flexibility and pragmatic solutions are more important than static type checking
| | |